Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:49:45 -0400
From: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>, jeffm@...e.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: kernel: numerous infoleaks

Jeff Mahoney correctly pointed out that the first case
(drivers/net/tulip/de4x5.c) is not a security issue because the copied
data is from a union, not a struct.  I've gone through these again to
confirm that the remaining three are actually security issues.

Therefore, CVE-2010-3295 should be marked as invalid.

-Dan

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> wrote:
> ----- "Eugene Teo" <eugene@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Reported by Dan Rosenberg,
>>
>> drivers/net/tulip/de4x5.c: reading uninitialized stack memory
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/169
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/633158
>
> CVE-2010-3295
>
>>
>> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c reading uninitialized stack memory
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/170
>> introduced in 4d22de3e (v2.6.21-rc2)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/633149
>
> CVE-2010-3296
>
>>
>> drivers/net/eql.c: reading uninitialized stack memory
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/168
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/633145
>
> CVE-2010-3297
>
>>
>> drivers/net/usb/hso.c: reading uninitialized memory
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/167
>> introduced in 542f5482 (v2.6.29-rc1)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/633140
>>
>
> CVE-2010-3298
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>    JB
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.