[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:55:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
To: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: mailman
Josh,
Was there a particular reason to split these into separate CVEs? A quick
glance suggests they affect the same version, and since they're the same
type, would normally argue for a merge.
- Steve
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Josh Bressers wrote:
>
> ----- "Huzaifa Sidhpurwala" <huzaifas@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are two mailman vulns. fixed by the following patch:
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2010-September/000151.html
>>
>> Particular Red Hat Bugzilla entries are the following:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631881
>
> CVE-2010-3089 mailman XSS via list information HTML template
>
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631859
>
> CVE-2010-3090 mailman XSS in list information overview
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> JB
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
