Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BCBB604.40704@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:46:44 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@...il.com>
Subject: Re: kernel: hvc_console: Fix race between hvc_close
 and hvc_remove

Hi Michael,

On 04/18/2010 06:15 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:03:58 +0800 Eugene Teo wrote:
>
>> Heads-up. You might want to backport this if your kernel is affected. We
>> are not requesting a CVE name for this as it does not affect any of our
>> Red Hat supported kernels.
>
> are you sure about this?  i see the vulnerable code upstream in both

Thanks for making sure.

> 2.6.26 and 2.6.32.  does redhat not ship hvc in their kernels?  i think
> this should get a cve id because the more vanilla distros will have
> shipped with this included.

At least not for the officially supported kernels as shipped in Red Hat 
Enterprise Linux. I don't speak for other vendors, so if they need a CVE 
name, they should request for one.

Thanks, Eugene
--
Eugene Teo / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.