[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:39:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: jt@....org
Subject: Re: CVE request: oping allows the disclosure of
arbitrary file contents
----- "Tomas Hoger" <thoger@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:15:57 +0200 Julien Tinnes <jt@....org> wrote:
>
> > in case anyone cares, oping also attempts to drop privileges with
> > setuid(getuid()); without checking setuid()'s return value.
> >
> > It's an obvious vulnerability, because a local attacker can make setuid()
> > fail by setting a resource limit of 0 for RLIMIT_NPROC with setrlimit().
>
> Does the RLIMIT_NPROC trick work against oping, or any setuid app that calls
> setuid(getuid())?
>
This should work for everything that calls setuid()
I have a little bit about this here:
http://www.bress.net/blog/archives/34-setuid-madness.html
The short story is that if you call setuid(), you need to check the return
code.
--
JB
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ