Openwall Project   /home  Owl  JtR  Pro  crypt  pam_passwdqc  tcb  phpass  scanlogd  popa3d  msulogin  /  Linux  BIND  /  advisories  presentations  /  services  donations  /  wordlists  passwords  /  NEWS  community  lists  Wiki  CVSweb  mirrors  signatures
bringing security into open environments
 
Password Recovery Resources on the Net
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:49:57 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Foremost, the mmap_min_addr protection is not in older kernels (<2.6.23) at all,
> so its kinda "not implemented" instead of "bug".

Oh, understood.  I did not think that way, because mmap_min_addr is
implemented in recent 2.4 kernels, which are sort of "older", and it is
also implemented in RHEL-5'ish OpenVZ kernels that we actually use.
(BTW, I'd be happy to share the mmap_min_addr back-port patch to
RHEL-5'ish kernels with Red Hat if there's any interest.)

I am going to release 2.4.37.3-ow1 with a CVE-2009-1895 fix in it, and I
expect it to get into 2.4.37.4.  It's not important for systems with
"sane" userlands (no crappy SUID-root programs), though.

Alexander

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ