[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:41:31 +0200
From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: clamav clamd and clamscan DoS and bypass by malformated archive
Am Donnerstag 09 April 2009 schrieb Tomas Hoger:
> Upstream 0.95.1 seems to fix at least 2 other issues that may be of
> interest:
>
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1553
>
> svn diff -c 5032 http://svn.clamav.net/svn/clamav-devel/
Stupid question but is it common clamav policy to not mention security
releases? Anyone any info about that?
This is a bit frightening for a "security" product (they have a menu
point "security" on their website but it seems they don't tend to fill it
with information...)
--
Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/
GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: hanno@...eck.de
[ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Hosted by DataForce ISP -
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux