[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:59:28 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request for proftpd
* [2009-02-11 11:16:14 -0800] TJ Saunders wrote:
>> >As discussed there, this is a duplicate of an earlier bug:
>> >
>> > http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3124
>> >
>> >and has been fixed in ProFTPD 1.3.2rc3 and later.
>>
>> Oh, forgot to ask. It looks like this would have been introduced in
>> 1.3.1. Is that correct? So the affected versions would be
>> 1.3.1 to 1.3.2rc2.
>
>That's correct.
Great. Thanks for that clarification.
>> Also, as I was looking at the Gentoo report, I noticed bug #3173 which
>> likely also needs a CVE name (for the "encoding-dependent SQL injection
>> vulnerability").
>
>Yes; I was just about to note the same thing. =)
Steve, can we get a second CVE name that references
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
Thanks much.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Hosted by DataForce ISP -
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux