[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081029172226.5f460084@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:22:26 +0100
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: taviso@....lonestar.org, coley@...re.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: lynx (old) .mailcap handling flaw
Hi Tavis!
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:45:57 +0000 Tavis Ormandy
<taviso@....lonestar.org> wrote:
> Well obviously. The attack would be convincing someone to debug an
> application with a testcase provided in a tarball
Correct, I should have listed that before as separate case for gdb /
valgrind. But is there any good way to protect against this without
crippling this feature completely?
> or to debug something in a specific directory.
That should be covered by previously mentioned 2).
> If you just dumped one in /tmp on a system I use and waited a few
> weeks, there's a strong possibility you would pwn me.
... looks like I should check whether sdf still offers free shell
accounts ;).
> Of course, guess who reported that ;-) (me).
Correct, again... CVE-2005-1705
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
Note to self: Do more research before trying to teach old dog ^W^W
Tavis some new ^W really really old tricks... ;)
I'll shut up now...
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
