[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:07:01 -0800
From: Jonathan Smith <smithj@...ethemallocs.com>
To: matthias.andree@....de
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Id Request: fetchmail <= 6.3.8 DoS when logging
long headers in -v -v mode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Impeding the 6.3.9 release, there are some nasty bugs that aren't
> security relevant which are pending the fix, but are hard to debug.
Are these bugs regressions against 6.3.8? If so, it might make sense to
cherry-pick the security fixes from svn and cut a 6.3.8.1 release with
6.3.8+patches. If not, why let non-regressions hold up 6.3.9?
smithj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAkhWudUACgkQCG91qXPaRelIxwCgljo90dSgky/T/FTXCLM4sfRp
/9cAn2hrrcwsuH8a9lIS45z5MiW3IK0c
=D/74
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Hosted by DataForce ISP -
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux