oss-security - Re: CVE ID request: GNUTLS

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080520113437.58a4dbd8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 11:34:37 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: smithj@...ethemallocs.com, Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
        "Steven M.
 Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
        Simon Josefsson <simon@...efsson.org>
Subject: Re: CVE ID request: GNUTLS

On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:26:41 -0800 Jonathan Smith
<smithj@...ethemallocs.com> wrote:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
> | Several issues have been announced in GNUTLS-SA-2008-1:

Some references for Steven to use in the CVE descriptions:

Upstream announcements:

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-05/msg00051.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-05/msg00060.html

CERT-FI advisory:

https://www.cert.fi/haavoittuvuudet/advisory-gnutls.html

Upstream patches:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnutls.git;a=commitdiff;h=bc8102405fda11ea00ca3b42acc4f4bce9d6e97b
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnutls.git;a=commitdiff;h=d223040e498bd50a4b9e0aa493e78587ae1ed653


> Note that the fixed versions has changed. 2.2.4 didn't fix the issue,
> so they pushed 2.2.5 today as well.
> 
> reference
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/2812

Based on discussion here:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-05/msg00055.html

It seems like a regression.

Adding Simon to CC, so he may comment on this if he wants.

-- 
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.