[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:39:04 -0500
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: welcome
> > * Organized - Not a mishmash of undecided people. Have clear goals and
> > procedures.
> >
> > There will be a wiki that contains the static information with respect to
> > how things are handled. Some issues that will need deciding are:
> >
> > 1) How are new members accepted
> > 2) When do we kick out unresponsive members
> > 3) How do we deal with people who develop bad attitudes
>
> This sounds good, except that I see no need to "kick out unresponsive
> members". If they like to listen to our conversations in real time
> (rather than browse the archives) and maybe learn from them - this can
> only be good. Of course, active contribution would be even better.
> So is this "kick out policy" an attempt to encourage contribution?..
>
> Or were you speaking of a vendor-sec equivalent - not this list, but
> perhaps yet another list to be created for the small-and-trusted part of
> the group? If so, how would that differ from vendor-sec itself? Would
> it differ in that any (trusted?) Open Source projects would be accepted,
> not just distribution "vendors"?
We can probably disregard the whole kick out bits. That really would only
apply to a private list that deals with sensitive information. I don't
think there is a benefit to creating a private list at this time, as
vendor-sec exists and is functional.
>
> > * Active - discuss flaws (not a bunch of sponges)
> >
> > We want a group that is responsive and active with respect to the handling
> > of flaws. There will always be a subset of members that don't care about
> > a certain flaw and this is fine, but if someone is always silent, how are
> > they a benefit? Members should be encouraged to participate in
> > discussions and analysis.
>
> The same comments apply here.
>
> Yes, we would like to see a lot of active members, but do we really need
> to kick out the sponges, would that be of benefit?
No, there isn't a benefit in this instance. I do think that encouraging
everyone to contribute in some meaningful manner is a good goal. Anytime
you have a list full of smart people, the new people are usually quite
intimidated and afraid to engage. We need to be mindful of this.
>
> > * Educate - many open source groups suck at security
> >
> > Create several documents that are helpful to the open source community
> >
> > 1) How to report a security flaw
> > 2) How to accept security reports from researchers
> > 3) Basic ideas behind having a security response team
>
> Right - all of this should go on the wiki, and any discussions may occur
> in here.
Yes. I have some notes on this as well. I've been pondering how best to
present this data for quite some time, and have unsuccessfully peddled a
presentation to several conferences.. I'll have to dig out my old notes
(which really means find them in the file ghetto that is my ~).
Thanks for the feedback.
--
JB
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Hosted by DataForce ISP -
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux