[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: loongarch64 atomics not working?
Waldemar Brodkorb dixit:
>lixing wrote,
>> We've tested static and dynamic build mksh with commit id
>> cbb8a0196aab53165a35339fd91ade599d184f both works ok.
That’s great to hear!
>Can you check with qemu-system-loongarch64? I use gcc 13.2.0,
>binutils 2.42 and Linux 6.6.18 with the defconfig provided.
>Qemu is also 8.2.2. Can you provide your QEMU_EFI.fd for download?
Perhaps to distinguish between emulation/runtime and toolchain
faults you could send each other the mksh binaries (if statically
linked, otherwise probably them plus musl’s dynamic parts)?
gl hf,
//mirabilos
--
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
