[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:10:57 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: Hongliang Wang <wanghongliang@...ngson.cn>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: add loongarch64 port v9.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:54:44AM +0800, Hongliang Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion, I have modified the dynamic linker
> name according to the basic ABI types are specified in the ABI
> document of the LoongArch, and post 0001-add-loongarch64-port-v9.patch,
> as shown in the attachment.
>
> Based on 0001-add-loongarch64-port-v8.patch,the modifications for
> 0001-add-loongarch64-port-v9.patch are as follows:
>
> ---
> arch/loongarch64/reloc.h | 10 ++++++----
> configure | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch64/reloc.h b/arch/loongarch64/reloc.h
> index a4482b48..6907de8e 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch64/reloc.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch64/reloc.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> -#ifdef __loongarch_soft_float
> -#define FP_SUFFIX "-sf"
> -#else
> -#define FP_SUFFIX ""
> +#if defined __loongarch_double_float
> +#define FP_SUFFIX "-lp64d"
> +#elif defined __loongarch_single_float
> +#define FP_SUFFIX "-lp64f"
> +#elif defined __loongarch_soft_float
> +#define FP_SUFFIX "-lp64s"
> #endif
>
> #define LDSO_ARCH "loongarch64" FP_SUFFIX
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 55d179f1..93b06287 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -673,7 +673,9 @@ trycppif __AARCH64EB__ "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}_be
> fi
>
> if test "$ARCH" = "loongarch64" ; then
> -trycppif __loongarch_soft_float "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}-sf
> +trycppif __loongarch_double_float "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}-lp64d
> +trycppif __loongarch_single_float "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}-lp64f
> +trycppif __loongarch_soft_float "$t" && SUBARCH=${SUBARCH}-lp64s
> printf "checking whether compiler support FCSRs... "
> echo "__asm__(\"movfcsr2gr \$t0,\$fcsr0\");" > "$tmpc"
> if $CC -c -o /dev/null "$tmpc" >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
> --
>
> Please review again, and point them out if any questions need to be
> modified, thanks.
Why are you changing the ABI name for the existing one to something
different rather than just adding the missing ones, and doing it with
a name that's less descriptive ("-sf" is widely recognized as a
softfloat suffix, -lp64s not so much) and adding a redundant "lp64"
part to each one that does not seem to be part of distinguishing the
float ABI?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
