[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 01:49:35 +0000
From: Rodolfo Câmara Villordo <rodolfovillordo@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Big thanks to musl developers.
Hi,
Sorry for the noob question. Why compiling the libc with -O0 is "a thing"
to you? I can only imagine reasons surrounding security research, is that
your use case?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 04:29 naruto canada <narutocanada@...il.com> wrote:
> hi
>
> Big thanks to musl developers. You guys have done a good job.
> I've managed to port most of my desktop over to musl.
> It is currently compiling itself within qemu :)
> on x86_64 real machine :)
> Once qemu is ported, the other targets are much easier.
> It takes surprising little effort to port most packages.
> It took me only about a week. Very little changes was needed.
> I was only forced to upgrade a few packages.
> The first time in 22 years,
> that I was able to compile libc with -O0 and not -O2 :)
> Thanks.
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
