[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:44:14 -0500
From: <sidneym@...eaurora.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: sigsetjmp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 8:13 PM
> To: sidneym@...eaurora.org
> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> Subject: Re: [musl] sigsetjmp
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:01:24PM -0500, sidneym@...eaurora.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:11 PM
> > > To: sidneym@...eaurora.org
> > > Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> > > Subject: Re: [musl] sigsetjmp
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:45:11PM -0500, sidneym@...eaurora.org
> wrote:
> > > > Wanting to make sure I'm reading the requirements correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like this routine only needs to save the link register and
> > > > env, call setjmp then restore the link register and env followed
> > > > by the tail
> > call.
> > >
> > > Yes, that's correct. This is an unconventional design but necessary
> > > so
> > that the
> > > stack frame has already been restored when signals are unmasked by
> > > siglongjmp. See the message for commit
> > > 583e55122e767b1586286a0d9c35e2a4027998ab for a description of how
> > > this works.
> > >
> > > > Hexagon was out of date so I did this:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ..balign 4
> > > >
> > > > ..type sigsetjmp,@function
> > > >
> > > > sigsetjmp:
> > > >
> > > > // if savemask is 0 sigsetjmp behaves like setjmp
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > p0 = cmp.eq(r1, #0)
> > > >
> > > > if (p0.new) jump:t ##setjmp
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > memw(r0+#64+4) = r16 // save r16 in __ss[0]
> > > >
> > > > memw(r0+#64) = r31 // save linkregister in __fl
> > > >
> > > > r16 = r0
> > > >
> > > > }
> > >
> > > This is not correct. __ss[0] is occupied by the saved signal mask,
> > > and
> > will be
> > > clobbered when it's saved in the tail call. Instead you need to use
> > > unused
> > space
> > > in struct __jmp_buf_tag. The canonical place is
> > > (char*)__ss+8 (the "HURD ABI area" :) assuming _NSIG==65.
> >
> > I was not able to find a description of the HURD ABI area is it
> > documented someplace?
>
> By "HURD ABI" I just mean the fact that sigset_t is gratuitously 128 bytes
rather
> than 8 bytes, because early glibc imagined uselessly having 1024 signals
like
> GNU HURD will someday do.
>
> The point is that only the first 8 (or 16, on MIPS*) bytes of the signal
mask save
> area (__ss[]) are actually used for saving a signal mask, and the rest is
free for
> sigsetjmp to use for other purposes.
>
> > So upon entry to sigsetjmp __ss[0] is holding the saved mask and using
> > __ss[0] to buffer r16 will clobber it, correct? As it is coded
> > __ss[0] is just used over the call to setjmp to preserve the value of
r16.
>
> No, upon entry __ss[0] is uninitialized. __sigsetjmp_tail will store the
signal
> mask into it (and __ss[1], on 32-bit archs) before returning to the
caller, and on
> the second return (via siglongjmp) will restore the signal mask from
there.
>
> > If __ss is r0+#64+4, then you are suggesting that I use r0+#64+4+8 or
> > __ss[2]. I need to look into this some more because with that I'm have
> > some testcase issues.
>
> Yes, that sounds right. Look what other archs do. The arm version is very
easy
> to read.
Thanks, I updated the source to match aarch64 and at the moment all of the
associated tests are passing.
>
> Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
