[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:37:53 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...anix.com>
To: Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman0x666@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
riel@...hat.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Hossam Hassan <7ossam9063@...il.com>,
Ahmed Lotfy <A7med.lotfey@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: Design Decision for KVM based anti rootkit
On 16/06/18 12:49, Ahmed Soliman wrote:
>
> To wrap things up, the basic design will be a method for communication
> between host and guest is guest can request certain pages to be read
> only, and then host will force them to be read-only by guest until
> next guest reboot, then it will impossible for guest OS to have them
> as RW again. The choice of which pages to be set as read only is the
> guest's. So this way mixed pages can still be mixed with R/W content
> even if holds kernel code.
It's not clear how this increases security. What threats is this
protecting again?
As an attacker, modifying the sensitive pages (kernel text?) will
require either: a) altering the existing mappings for these (to make
them read-write or user-writable for example); or b) creating aliased
mappings with suitable permissions.
If the attacker can modify page tables in this way then it can also
bypass the suggested hypervisor's read-only protection by changing the
mappings to point to a unprotected page.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
