[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 00:45:18 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OMP vs. OpenCL performance
On 2017-10-01 00:38, magnum wrote:
> On 2017-09-30 18:12, Scott I. Remick wrote:
>> Ok here what I had gotten:
>>
>> ~/JohnTheRipper/run$ ./john --session=opencl
>> --format=PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512-opencl hash.txt
>> Device 0: GeForce GTX 750
>> Using default input encoding: UTF-8
>> Loaded 1 password hash (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512-opencl, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+
>> [PBKDF2-SHA512 OpenCL])
>> Cost 1 (iteration count) is 48543 for all loaded hashes
>>
>> So if the "48543" is what you thought would need to be over 500K to
>> account for the speed, then I suppose maybe there is indeed a
>> problem...? Currently been running 1 day, 13h, on phase 3/3 and 777p/s
BTW I hope you mean 777 p/s on GPU now. If you get that speed on CPU,
all bets are off - it's now too fast (LOL). The answer below was in the
context of your CPU figure of about 13-14 p/s.
magnum
> One (or some) of the format's test vectors have an iteration count of
> 10000. You can benchmark it like this:
>
> $ ../run/john -test -form:PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 -cost:10000
> Will run 8 OpenMP threads
> Benchmarking: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+ [PBKDF2-SHA512
> 128/128 AVX 2x]... (8xOMP) DONE
> Speed for cost 1 (iteration count) of 10000
> Raw: 721 c/s real, 96.2 c/s virtual
>
> The figure above is from a 5 yo laptop w/ 4 cores 8 threads and clocked
> at a relaxed 2.3 GHz. Unless I'm totally senile right now, that should
> mean a figure of about 148 c/s for 48583 iterations and you only only
> get a tenth of that? I have no idea why (unless your gear is also
> occupied with computing other things).
>
> Try that exact benchmark and report your outcome. The system should be
> idle when benchmarking, of course.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
