[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:54:40 +0400
From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: existing collaboration tools suitable for MJohn
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:40:45PM +0200, Simon Marechal wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 09:10 PM, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> > To the of that mail I convinced myself that request-tracker is a good
> > choice but I am still have a feeling that I should at least look on
> > one other solution before any further actions in this direction.
>
> Last time I looked at it I thought that this was proven software, but
> that it needed a lot of customisation before being usable. And I
> intended to use it as a request tracker ;)
I think attack is some kind of request. Maybe it is too far similarity.
> I did not look at the source code, but it is old perl, so it might be
> even worse than a rails application. Did you try reading the source ? It
> is highly likely that you will have to alter it if you go that way, so
> having a quick look might give you a good idea of how hard it is going
> to be.
I do not think that it was frozen since its creation. I guess they
updated it to newer versions.
I just picked random perl file
(request-tracker4/etc/upgrade/shrink_transactions_table.pl) from
request-tracker and read it. At the beginning it contains:
use 5.8.3;
use strict;
use warnings;
It is promising. Thought Perl 5.8 was released in 2002 but 'grep -r
"use 5"' says that only two files have such line. In general other
contents of that file does not seem strange for me. So I think this is
not too old perl. Do not I miss something?
Regards,
Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
