[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:59:18 -0500
From: Rich Rumble <richrumble@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: pwgen
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> Rich,
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:31:02PM -0500, Rich Rumble wrote:
>> I'm wondering if the windows version might offer more entropy than it's
>> CLI cousin?
>
> Actually, the Windows program you found:
>
> http://pwgen-win.sourceforge.net
>
> appears to have almost nothing in common (except for the purpose and a
> portion of the name) with the Unix program we were talking about:
>
> http://pwgen.sourceforge.net
>
> The current version numbers look similar, but this appears to be a mere
> coincidence.
DOH!
> P.S. You managed to post your message to a new thread, even though you
> reused the Subject. If you want to post to an existing thread, you need
> to use your mail program's "reply" feature on an existing message in the
> thread. (Similarly, whenever you actually do want to start a new
> thread, you need to send your message to the posting address anew, not
> as a "reply" to anything.) Thanks!
DOH!
My mistake all around :)
-rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
