[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:27:20 +0200
From: SL <auditor@...chat.de>
To: "john-users@...ts.openwall.com" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: latest john and all patch included
Am 10.07.2009 um 01:38 schrieb Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> Basically, the question is - should someone be putting out pre-patched
> trees for the dummies?
Whoever wants that doesn't care about opensource. Make it part of JtR
Pro, unless that gives licensing issues.
> Not only pre-patched, but also pre-compiled distributions make more
> sense to me, especially given that some systems don't come with a C
> compiler pre-installed (e.g., Xcode for Mac OS X is a gigabyte
> download).
Supports my suggestion above.
> Then, maybe the jumbo patch should eventually be replaced with a
> community tree, which several contributors would have commit access
> to.
> This would probably solve the pre-patched tree "issue", making the
> patch secondary.
So you really think that "cvs checkout" will solve the "I have trouble
applying 'patch -p1 < ../patchfile.diff' problem? Just kidding. ;-) I
like this idea!
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
