[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:54:11 +0300
From: Pietari Kivikangas <JTR1998@...l.ru>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Inverted chatsets?
Pietari Kivikangas wrote:
> When the rec_entry variable in the module inc.c (in .rec file produced
> by John The Ripper version 1.7 it is stored at the 11th position from
> the end of file, the following numbers are 0 and 8) reaches the range
> of values 3000-3419, the probability of the next password candidate
> being the password you are looking for floats in the range between
> 1/0x00003afa8baa2780LL and 1/0x00000057cfdce769LL.
Sorry, i calculated wrong. Below the calculations seem to be correct
(i'm not a specialist in statistics though):
Total amount of all possible password candidates: 6634204312890625
Approximated total number of password candidates within the 'rec_entry'
value 3000: 0x00000057cfdce769 = 377149515625, i.e. about 0.00568% of
all passwords.
Approximated total number of password candidates within the 'rec_entry'
value 3419: 0x00003afa8baa2780 = 64847759419264, i.e. about 0.97748% of
all passwords.
So in both cases the probability for a single candidate is equal, i.e.
0.00568% / 377149515625 = 0.97748% / 64847759419264 =
1,5073397695288715005983296011248e-16 (without %). But for the
'rec_entry' value 3419 there are much more password candidates than for
3000.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
